SSJC Letter to Premier John Horgan and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau re: Attacks on Indigenous Sovereignty at Wet'suwet'en

Premier Horgan and Prime Minister Trudeau:

On behalf of the members of the Teaching Support Staff Union’s (TSSU) Solidarity and Social Justice Committee, we write to express condemnation of your governments’ attack on Indigenous sovereignty and your own legislation of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) in regards to the Unist’ot’en camp on Wet’suwet’en territory.

As an organisation dedicated to upholding fairness and rights, we see your (in)actions on this matter as a violation of not Canadian and Wet’suwet’en law, but all of the statements you have made regarding the building of equality for Indigenous communities and commitments to reconciliation. Furthermore, Premier Horgan, your (in)actions on this matter are in direct violation of your words put forward regarding the implementation of the UNDRIP through Bill 41. Similar to other commissions, reports, and legislative attempts, the failure of this initiative is being enacted through your collusion with industries like Coastal GasLink and the RCMP. The pushing through of this pipeline through occupied territories without consent, despite your reconciliatory statements, destroy trust and undermine the hard work of Indigenous communities and individuals who have been committed to this work and change.

Premier Horgan’s claim that the government’s actions were in accordance with, and in protection of, Canadian law is foundationally wrong. As plaintiffs in the landmark Delgamuukw-Gisday’wa proceeding, the Supreme Court of Canada held that Wet’suwet’en title to lands has never been extinguished. Canadian courts have subsequently confirmed that governments and companies must seek the consent of Indigenous titleholders before proceeding with the development of traditional territories. The Province has undermined the Hereditary Chiefs’ authority throughout this entire project by funding and supporting new entities, and consulting those who lack jurisdiction over these territories. Furthermore, the consultation process undertaken by Coastal GasLink has not considered the legitimacy of the power held by hereditary Chiefs, choosing only to consider the voices of elected Chiefs who are part of an imposed government system. This is in violation of the Indian Act, which clearly states that elected Chiefs have jurisdiction only over reserve lands, while hereditary Chiefs have jurisdiction over and stewardship of the traditional territory. Thereby, the rights of the five hereditary Chiefs of the Wet’suwet’en Nations include the right to use, manage, possess land, and to decide how the land will be used. 

Moreover, these (in)actions go against both the BC Provincial and Federal Governments’ commitments to address climate change. It is part of a recently-approved $40 billion fracked gas project LNG Canada that is the single largest private sector investment in Canadian history. The NDP provincial government announced tax breaks for this liquefied natural gas (LNG) project even though the biggest driver of climate change in the province over the coming decades will be from the LNG industry. All the Wet'suwet'en Clans have rejected the Coastal GasLink pipeline due to the catastrophic and irreversible impact of fracking on waterways, land, food systems, and cultural practices. According to Freda Huson, Unist’ot’en Hereditary Spokesperson, "The land is not separate from us. The land sustains us. And if we don’t take care of her, she won’t be able to sustain us, and we as a generation of people will die.”

Coastal GasLink’s use of the Canadian legal system and the RCMP against Indigenous peoples is counter to the narrative of reconciliation your governments are using, as well as the UNDRIP, of which Canada is a signatory. In fact, the actions of the Wet’suwet’en to protect their territory from the environmental impacts of this project and their defense of the rights are more productive towards meeting the stated goals of the governments. Their direct actions in standing against the creation of pipelines that support fracking and environmental harm across BC shows a far-reaching recognition of the immediate actions that need to be taken to meet climate change goals made by Canadian governments and international accords.  

The UNDRIP clearly protects Indigenous right to self-determination and occupation of lands through Articles 8 and 10 that outline state responsibility to protecting sovereignty regarding land. Article 10 specifically states: “Indigenous peoples shall not be forcibly removed from their lands or territories. No relocation shall take place without the free, prior and informed consent of the indigenous peoples concerned.” According to Victoria Tauli-Corpuz, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, addressed the 17th Session of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues describing that criminalization surrounding land occupation and protest against the government has become an increasingly common tool against Indigenous peoples, stating: 

“The rapid expansion of development projects on indigenous lands without their consent is driving a global crisis. These attacks – whether physical or legal – are an attempt to silence Indigenous Peoples voicing their opposition to projects that threaten their livelihoods and cultures.” 

Another primary intersection of violence is that of consent regarding physical bodies and the land, particularly around natural resource extraction. It is particularly alarming following the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women’s Inquiry that industrial work camps bring harm and inequality that is being disregarded at Unist’ot’en and across the country. Many studies, such as that put forward by Amnesty International show a direct correlation between increased violence and remote industry camps, which produce an influx of temporary workers – a "shadow population" of mostly young men whose presence contributes to the vulnerability of Indigenous women and strains social services (https://www.amnesty.ca/outofsight). Given the high rates of individuals experiencing increased rates of drug- and alcohol-related offences, sexual offences, domestic violence, and gang violence, as well as sex-industry activities, this needs to be addressed through investigation, standards, and accountability of resource companies and projects. In response to the existing and impending impacts on Indigenous women, girls, and 2SLGBTQQIA peoples through construction of the projects like the Coastal GasLink pipeline, your governments must take immediate action on eliminating physical, emotional, and structural violence as a result of remote labour camps.

We call on the Provincial and Federal Governments of Canada to respect the rights, jurisdiction and laws of the Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chiefs and peoples on their unceded territories, as upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada and their own communities. This includes the removal of militarized RCMP officers who are used by the colonial state to protect resource extraction projects and threaten Indigenous sovereignty. Further, they must create legislation that outlines meaningful consultation and consent processes that incorporate both elected and hereditary Chiefs’ perspectives. Until then, the Provincial and Federal Government must revoke the permits for this project until standards of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent under the UNDRIP are met. 

Yours,

Solidarity & Social Justice Committee

Teaching Support Staff Union (TSSU)

ssjc@tssu.ca

SSJC Letter of Solidarity with AGSEM’s Campaign to Unionize Teaching Support Workers at McGill University

SSJC Letter of Solidarity with AGSEM’s Campaign to Unionize Teaching Support Workers at McGill University

The Solidarity & Social Justice Committee of the Teaching Support Staff Union (TSSU) stands in solidarity with The Association for Graduate Students Employed at McGill (AGSEM) in their campaign to unionize teaching support workers at McGill University.

As unionized workers ourselves we recognize the vital importance of unions in academia, where precariousness, insecurity, and exploitation run rampant. A union would entitle teaching support workers to basic protections and rights, advocacy and grievance procedures, and protections for medical and parental leave, among other important benefits.

We further recognize the uneven unionization currently in place at McGill – with some teaching support workers enjoying unionization while others are left without – which creates a troubling hierarchy between people doing similar or nearly identical work. As such, we agree with AGSEM in their belief “that teaching support workers at McGill should receive the same benefits and protections of unionized teaching assistants and invigilators, and that the absence of these benefits and protections presents many serious threats to the protection of all teaching labour at McGill.”

The work performed by teaching support workers at McGill is critical to its functioning and must be recognized as such. We encourage eligible workers to join AGSEM to further the goal of union certification. Moreover, we call on McGill Administration to not interfere with the unionization drive and, when the time comes, bargain fairly and in good faith with AGSEM in their role as the agent for teaching support staff at McGill.

In solidarity,

Solidarity & Social Justice Committee

Teaching Support Staff Union

ssjc@tssu.ca

Statement of Condemnation — Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019

The General Membership of the Teaching Support Staff Union condemns India’s Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) of 2019. This legislation expedites Indian citizenship for Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians fleeing religious persecution in Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan, if they moved to India before 2014. However, it does not extend the same protection to Muslims and other persecuted minority sects. (1) The CAA presents an Islamophobic narrative and discrimination based on religion, directly contradicting the Indian constitution’s commitment to a secular republic. (2) The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights is concerned that this legislation is “fundamentally discriminatory” against Muslim people, and allows for discrimination against atheists and members of other religious groups. The Commissioner stated that these amendments “appear to undermine the commitment to equality before the law enshrined in India’s constitution” and “will have a discriminatory effect on people's access to nationality.” 

This amendment to the Citizenship Act, along with the proposed National Register of Citizens (NRC), may create significant barriers to citizenship for trans* people, Indigenous tribes, people from lower castes, and other marginalized groups. These people have been excluded from the recent NRC in Assam (3)(4), and may therefore be unable to produce documents of citizenship. Those affected by the changes risk being subject to a complete loss of citizenship and livelihood, potential detention in camps currently under construction and/or already in use across the country. (5)(6) Further, the CAA is a direct assault on the Indigenous communities of Northeast India who will be detrimentally affected by the widespread migration the Act could bring forth. (7) 

Further, we condemn the repression of the democratic protests across India (8), including the student protestors at Aligarh Muslim University and the Jamia Millia Islamia University. The presence of police using batons and tear gas against University students (9)(10) indicates blatant disrespect for the human rights of unarmed students and international law. In less than a month, over 1,500 protestors have been arrested and over 20 individuals have been killed, including children (11)(12)(13). In addition to depriving protestors of healthcare and legal aid (14)(15)(16), the Indian government has disabled internet access in Assam and parts of Uttar Pradesh (17)(18)(19). These attacks follow atrocities in the Muslim majority state of Jammu and Kashmir starting in August when the Indian government undemocratically stripped the state of its autonomous status. (20) (21)

Irrespective of the implications of the CAA, we underscore that protests and dissents are part and parcel of democracy. We stand with students’ rights to principled protest and intellectual freedom as these are central to the academic and democratic integrity of educational institutions. The actions of the Indian government headed by Narendra Modi are fascist. We stand in solidarity with our comrades in India and the patriotic citizens of India protesting the CAA and the fascist regime of the ruling government. We extend our solidarity with this international struggle to end the systematic oppression of marginalised people, and call for the Canadian government to join the international community in condemning these actions. (22)(23)(24)(25)